March 10, 2024

Mallory Pearson: "We Ate the Dark" (ARC Review)

Title: We Ate the Dark [on Amazon | on Goodreads]
Series: None so far (though according to a Goodreads reviewer, the author has - had? - a duology in mind)
Author: Mallory Pearson [Site | Goodreads]
Genres: Supernatural, Afterlife, Multiverse, Mystery
Year: 2024
Age: 16+ (technically an adult book, but it can be read by mature teens. See the WARNING! section though)
Stars: 4/5
Pros: Visceral and lyrical (if dark) celebration of found family, queer love, female friendship, and everything in between.
Cons: Metaphor galore - some of them over the top or bizarre. Open ending, with loose threads that were likely left for a potential sequel to pick.
WARNING! Horror and gore, violence (not of the sexual kind), near-drowning, fire, darkness (in the literal sense), claustrophobic spaces, evil spirit possession, extreme grief. 
Will appeal to: Those who love a story that crosses the space between all-consuming friendship and queer love. 

Blurb: Five years after Sofia Lyon disappeared, her remains are found stuffed into the hollow of a tree bursting through the floorboards of an abandoned house in the woods. The women who loved her flock home to the North Carolina hills to face their grief. Frankie, Sofia’s twin, is in furious mourning. Poppy is heartbroken. Cass has never felt more homesick. And Marya knows something the rest of them don’t. Determined to find Sofia’s murderer, they share more than a need to see justice done for their friend. As Sofia’s secrets unravel, so do those of the woods, and the women soon realize that Sofia might not be who they thought she was at all. And that whoever - or whatever - killed her is coming after them. (Amazon excerpt)

Review: First off...DISCLAIMER: this title was up for grabs on NetGalley (in the Read Now section). Thanks to 47North for providing a temporary ecopy. This didn't influence my review in any way.

SHADES OF LOVE

Let's address the elephant in the room first, because it's not like it's a secret: We Ate the Dark has a low average rating on Goodreads. Now, I don't mean to invalidate my fellow readers' opinions...but I'm surprised at the number of bad reviews this book is receiving. I get where most of them are coming from (more about that later), but at the same time, I found a lot to love in this story, and I'm going to tell you what it is.
Look, I may be a tad biased, because Pearson put together a lot of my favourite elements for this story: ghosts, haunted houses, alternate universes, a murder mystery, and a found family of women who just won't quit. But there's a lot more in here that I didn't expect and quite liked. Three old friends whose paths diverged after one of them disappeared are brought together by a shocking discovery (another trope I can't seem to tire of), and set on getting justice for one of them, all while trying to forgive and forget the hurt they've inflicted on one another, yet at the same time remember what they used to be for one another. Plus a newcomer with a gift that's more of a burden manages to get accepted into their circle, and does her best to make them realise she belongs with them. Cycling through the voices of all four girls (not to mention the missing twin's and a separate female character's), We Ate the Dark is first and foremost an exploration of female friendship and queer love and the liminal space between the two, from teenhood to new adulthood. I've never had relationship like those in the book, and yet the author was able to make me believe in each and every one of them. While there's no evident homophobia in the story, at least one of the characters tries to forge a more "traditional" sexual identity for herself, setting the whole tragedy in motion. But it's a different tragedy than you'd expect, and the focus of the story remains on the bond among women, the nuances of their relationships, the family that fails you and the one you make for yourself. And here's where Pearson's writing excels, down to the phenomenal single chapter in first person plural. [...]

SLIP OF THE TONGUE

Speaking of the writing...that seem to be the point of contention among the reviewers - the dealbreaker that creates a flow of 5-star reviews and an ocean of 1 and 2-star ones. Here's my take: undeniably, there's an abundance of metaphors in this story, some of which are extravagant or overripe. On the other hand, there's a robust dose of lyrical writing peeking from under the sometimes intimidating similes, and it does manage to shine and create pockets of beauty and ambiance in the middle of the clunkier passages (impressive enough for a debut book). It does help that We Ate the Dark doesn't read as if the author were browsing through a dictionary in order to find the most obscure and pretentious words (Vangie's Ghosts, I'm looking at you), and that even in its most unfortunate moments, Pearson's writing never stood in the way of my appreciation for the story and its characters. What I'm trying to say is, I'm not a fan of purple prose, but I can forgive a number of purple passages if the story as a whole is worth it - which to me, We Ate the Dark definitely is. And I would be SO pissed if the author didn't get the chance to wrap up the events she set in motion due to the lukewarm reception this book is getting - because alas, the ending has clearly been written with a second installment in mind, and I for one need to know what happens next...So let's help this story get the epilogue it deserves, shall we? 🙂

For more Adult books click here.
For more Supernatural books click here.

14 comments:

  1. "the family that fails you and the one you make for yourself"

    Gladthis was good. Let's hope we get that sequel :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks! *trying to manifest the sequel* 😅

      Delete
  2. I don't know, I took a quick look, and most of those low ratings were people who DNFed. I always give a DNF 3/5 (I don't rate on GR, but for the pub) because I did not read the whole book. How do I know if it got better? Anyhow, from the second half of your review, it seems like it could be more of a stylistic issue than the story itself. Regardless, I am glad you enjoyed this story.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Even so, the amount of DNF reviews is impressive...

      A stylistic issue, probably, but some of the metaphors don't make sense or are too much...I think Pearson has the makings of a good writer, if only she can rein those similes in a bit. Then again, this is a debut book, so maybe she still has to hone her craft.

      Delete
  3. I'm actually intrigued by the setup of this one. It has many of the elements that usually work for me. I never take too much stock in the final review number on goodreads. Instead, I try to listen to the opinions of more trusted reviewers like you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Aw, thanks! I do rely on Goodreads in order to get a whole range of opinions, but there have been times when a book got trashed on there and I trusted my guts about it because - as you said - it had a lot of elements that usually worked for me...and I ended up loving it. I hope I can steer some of my fellow bloggers/readers towards this book!

      Delete
  4. First, I want to apologize for not visiting your blog lately. I just realized I'm not getting email notifications anymore, and that's how I know you have a new post up. Is there ANY way to follow your blog other than GFC? Sorry Roberta!! Anyway, I love when a book with low ratings works for me, and it seems that's what happened here. That's why I don't rely on GR ratings 100 percent. Lovely review, and now I'll be catching up with your other posts:-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No worries! As I said on the blog a few weeks ago, I had to discontinue my blog newsletter because of the new Google policy about sending bulk emails from free addresses (including their own...what a joke). I guess the only alternative to GFC right now would be a feed reader...I'm sorry - and angry - but such is the life of us Blogger users 😭 😬.

      Thank you!

      Delete
  5. Old me would have not liked this one but I've been getting into these kinds of books of late so maybe...

    I can see the lower ratings based ont he reasons you gave but I'm glad you were able to connect with characters and story enough to overcome it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I guess after What We Buried and The Honeys, you can take this one and more! 😂

      Actually, I didn't mind the writing style so much...as I said, there were patches of beauty and an overall evocative atmosphere despite the (more than) occasional awkward similes.

      Delete
  6. As long as book keeps my attention and doesn't give me a cliffhanger ending I can usually give it at least a 5 star review. We aren't all going to like the same books though and that's ok.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL, I don't mind a cliffhanger on occasion...but the "keep-my-attention" part is mandatory. In this case, despite the engaging plot and interesting character dynamics, I guess the writing style was getting in the way of most readers too much, hence the number of DNFs...

      Delete
  7. Unique or especially flowery writing does seem to be very divisive. I'm glad you were able to enjoy some of the writing and deal with the rest for the great story!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think most readers stopped early because of the writing, and didn't get to the point where they could have enjoyed the book more because of that story. Maybe I stuck with it because there were many elements up my alley...

      Delete

Welcome to Offbeat YA! I love hearing from you and always - I mean always - acknowledge your comments. This used to be a full democracy place, because anyone could comment, regardless of being a registered member of any community. Unfortunately, I had to turn off the Anonymous comment option, because I was getting too much spam that didn't get filtered. So, you’ll need to have a Google account (Gmail will suffice) in order to comment. Sorry about that. Anyway, jump right in! Come on, you know you want to...😉 And be sure to leave a link!
BTW...I don't care if a post is a million months old - you comment, I respond. And you make my day 😃.
Note: this is an award/tag free blog. Sorry I can't accept nominations due to lack of time.

As per the GDPR guidelines, here's the link to my Privacy Policy.